tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14107862.post1939272943606695409..comments2023-11-16T17:56:09.323-06:00Comments on The “Blog” of “Unnecessary” Quotation Marks: also "no transfat"bethanyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08163733354894909762noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14107862.post-46537343991326059032007-12-11T01:24:00.000-06:002007-12-11T01:24:00.000-06:00Agreeing with drudge, here. I think this is a verb...Agreeing with drudge, here. I think this is a verbalization appropriate to the slightly gross product.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14107862.post-86705820157755063172007-09-11T08:01:00.000-05:002007-09-11T08:01:00.000-05:00After eating a whole bag of pork rinds, I often la...After eating a whole bag of pork rinds, I often lay back and say "Og."American Liberal Elitehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01825437003662822978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14107862.post-1010050229942839872007-09-06T10:46:00.000-05:002007-09-06T10:46:00.000-05:00Actually, this one is correctly quoted. Products ...Actually, this one is correctly quoted. Products that claim to have "0g Trans-fats" often still have trans-fats but have reduced the levels to low enough that the FDA allows them to print "0g trans-fats" on their package. I believe this is anywhere from .49g trans-fats and below. It's an advertising trick companies use to make it look like there are no trans-fats, when in fact they have simply reduced the size of a serving so the trans-fats fall below .49g. Really most other outlets should be putting quotes on this claim as well, but the FDA doesn't regulate punctuation I suppose.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com