Friday, February 29, 2008

also ok for transpersons


Lindsey saw this one in a wal-mart. The way I see it, those boots are pretty ugly no matter what your gender identity is.

10 comments:

Let's Clean It Up! said...

"Agh!" All punctuation goes within the quote "marks!!!"

Anonymous said...

For "her" sounds like it's for the mistress. I don't think "she" would be too happy with those boots!

Sarah said...

Hold on! Are those boots $27.64... or $87.43?

Anonymous said...

sarah... do you really care how much ugly boots cost?

MD said...

I think it means that if a female wears them, how feminine can she actually be?

Anonymous said...

those are so damn ugly that i can only imagine hipsters wearing them ironically, maybe with tights and shorts. but a hipster would never set foot in a walmart.

Windyridge said...

OK guys and gals, they are for hunters. When hunting, warmth and camouflage are the priorities, not fashion. The only difference between those and the male version is size. However nowadays they are making pink rifles, pink pistols and pink compound bows!

Jeff said...

Hipsters will go in a Wal-Mart, they'll just do so "ironically", to show how "indie" and "different" they are. And yes, my QMs were intentional.

Anonymous said...

i can't imagine what kind of environment into which those boots would blend. other than The Pink Triangle, et al.

Becca Kencade said...

Makes me think of the video of "Men with Petite feet on Funny or die. http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/1efd0fc62a