Ken saw this in Chicago. I guess it's ok to be any kind of chef, or not a chef at all. As long as you have experience.
Dias de fúria
18 hours ago
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About
SUBMISSIONS
Greatest Hits
- excuse our "emptiness"
- Quotation Area
- people and pets
- the other side
- ants
- fire alarm
- you're so "loving"
- police do be out
- building formerly known as church
- "no sex policy"
- "parents"
- "a" puppy
- cheaper than cheaper
- a true "classic"
- thank "god"
- revelation
- peanuts
- "stop"
- salvation/mexican food
- "congress person"
- President
- Speak English
- Security Guard
Unnecessary Quotes in Other Languages
you may also like
For Correct Usage:
6 comments:
I'm a little surprised that actual experience is required rather than just "experience". So you have to have real experience, but may or may not be a sushi chef?
At least it didn't say "SUSHI" CHEF, though that's what I would expect from a sushi place 1,500 miles from the nearest ocean.
I assume that being a fisherman dealing with bait would qualify for this postition.
Since there is not much cooking involved, I would have expected sushi "chef". - JohnnyB
Maybe this is correct since a chef is someone who COOKS and sushi is, by definition, NOT cooked. : )
Kind of reminds me how people who work at subway are called "Sandwich artists"
Post a Comment